9 . Const. P. 255/2025 (S.B.) Zubaida W/O Muhammad Irfan V/S Inspector General of Police (IGP) Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The regulation enjoins the police being scrupulously fair into the offender and the Magistracy is to be sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the legislation and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court in addition to from other courts However they have failed to have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The plenty of this power casts an obligation around the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for your crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated.

Official database for searching and viewing federal court dockets and case documents. Tiny fees use.

14. Within the light from the position explained earlier mentioned, it's concluded that a civil servant includes a fundamental right for being promoted even after his retirement by awarding proforma promotion; provided, his right of promotion accrued during his service but could not be deemed for no fault of his have and In the meantime he retired on attaining the age of superannuation without any shortcoming on his part about deficiency within the size of service or while in the form of inquiry and departmental action was so taken against his right of promotion. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Source: Order: Downloads 433 Order Date: 24-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp

The necessary analysis (called ratio decidendi), then constitutes a precedent binding on other courts; further analyses not strictly necessary to your determination from the current case are called obiter dicta, which represent persuasive authority but aren't technically binding. By contrast, decisions in civil regulation jurisdictions are generally shorter, referring only to statutes.[four]

149 . Const. P. 6193/2016 (D.B.) Syed Musawar Shah V/S M.D CSD and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the moment Petition under Article 199 in the Constitution based within the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued on the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement within the FIR lodged by FIA and in the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.

145 . Const. P. 3670/2023 (D.B.) Rehan Pervez V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the instant Petition under Article 199 in the Constitution based over the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued into the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement during the FIR lodged by FIA and within the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.

Within the United States, folks are not needed to hire an attorney to represent them in possibly civil or criminal matters. Laypeople navigating the legal system on their very own can remember just one rule of thumb when it relates to referring to case regulation or precedent in court documents: be as specific as feasible, leading the court, not only on the case, but towards the section and paragraph containing the pertinent information.

We're an independent branch of government constitutionally entrusted with the fair and just resolution of disputes in order to preserve the rule of legislation and also to protect the rights and liberties guaranteed from the Constitution and laws from the United States and this State.

, which is Latin for “stand by decided matters.” This means that a court will be bound to rule in accordance with a previously made ruling about the same style of check here case.

Binding Precedent – A rule or principle recognized by a court, which other courts are obligated to follow.

Matter:-DIRECTION Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 255/2025 (S.B.) Zubaida W/O Muhammad Irfan V/S Inspector General of Police (IGP) Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252210 Tag:The regulation enjoins the police to get scrupulously fair to your offender as well as the Magistracy is to make certain a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the regulation and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court as well as from other courts Nevertheless they have didn't have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The a good amount of this power casts an obligation about the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for the crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated.

The different roles of case regulation in civil and common regulation traditions create differences in just how that courts render decisions. Common regulation courts generally explain in detail the legal rationale at the rear of their decisions, with citations of both legislation and previous relevant judgments, and sometimes interpret the wider legal principles.

We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy on the information contained on this site, or maybe the information linked to within the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can develop inaccuracies. You should read the full case before counting on it for legal research purposes.

Criminal cases From the common law tradition, courts decide the regulation applicable to your case by interpreting statutes and applying precedents which record how and why prior cases have been decided. Not like most civil legislation systems, common legislation systems Adhere to the doctrine of stare decisis, by which most courts are bound by their very own previous decisions in similar cases. According to stare decisis, all lower courts should make decisions reliable with the previous decisions of higher courts.